![]() As
Reviewed By: |
Reginald Shepherd: 1963-2008
|
Seeing the
large, round, beaming black man coming toward me in the Casablanca
restaurant in Harvard Square was a thrill—the hug was warm, fiercely
close, long and so welcome. We had met at last. This was the poet I had
come to admire and love from a distance and in the best way possible for a
writer: through his writing—poems, essays, and, of course, emails. At
that point he hadn’t started his blog. In 2001, I was one of two
finalists for the Black Warrior Review’s chapbook competition; the other was
Reginald Shepherd, someone I hadn’t heard of. When I looked him up and
saw his poems and his publication history, I was immediately impressed and
honored to have been considered a contender of his, even briefly. Did I
then write to him and tell him so? No. He wrote to me, to
tell me so. What winner bothers to write such gracious things to the
loser? This was quintessential Reginald Shepherd, and this began our seven
years of e-mail correspondence, phone calls, and three actual meetings:
the first in the Casablanca. By the time we met, his e-mails had been a
life raft and inspiration for me during a catastrophic personal event, I
had come to know many details of his life and struggles (as well as joys),
and I was eager to meet him at last. We quickly fell into talking—life,
love, poetry—and the voice and presence I had come to know and rely on
in his correspondence—so intelligent, aware and empathic—was embodied
and unmistakably human. That
I didn’t know Reginald’s work as a poet or critic in 2001, even though
he had by then published three books of poetry, is not surprising since I
entered the contemporary poetry world through the back, or side, door of
the internet. Reginald was a “print-only” poet, one who had traveled
the academic route, studying first at Iowa, then at Brown, but was never,
as it turned out, an insider, instead (as he described it) always forced
back into the stance he knew best and was best at: persistent outsider.
The question always in the case of the outsider is who rejected whom
first, and, in Reginald’s case, it was hard to tell. He possessed a
larger-than-life personality, personhood, otherhood (as his third
collection was so aptly named), and the impression he made often
contradicted his intention (or emphasized it). As with all those of
unshakeable integrity, he could only be what he was (in spite of getting
into trouble for it) and his way of dealing with rejection was inspiring,
even heroic: overcome, persist, and succeed. For Reginald, rejection
seemed to be a spur rather than a dampening or discouragement. He
possessed genius along with persistence. All that was missing was exposure
to more readers. Thus, his blog was born—and it was born from a sense of
needing to speak up, to fully counter a comment on another blog (Ron
Silliman’s). It
took only a little while for Reginald to overcome the “print-only”
poet’s disdain for the rough-and-tumble web world of poetry. He saw very
quickly that there were people blogging whose work he respected (Joshua
Corey and Jasper Bernes were poets he often cited to me), that they were
young and smart and using technology in the service of poetry, and, most
importantly, the blog provided a way for him to speak directly to many,
without the worry of personality interference. And speak he did—I was
astonished when his blog developed from some early, brief entries to
full-blown essays. Nearly every day he provided the readers of his blog
with depth, insight, and inspiration. Reginald was a true teacher and a
scholar. The best part was his manner on-screen: strong-willed,
intellectually wide-ranging, but also modest and willing to listen and
respond respectfully to opposing points of view. He had found a medium for
his multiplicity of messages, and he knew it. Behind the scenes, he often
e-mailed or called to expostulate about one or another responses on his
blog—at the Atlanta AWP (2007) he even called my hotel room to urge me
online, to read someone’s response on his blog. I said, “Reginald,
come out of your room—the whole point here is to go see people in
person!” I loved walking into the hotel lobby there with him for his
first AWP—he was very nervous and kept saying he didn’t know anyone.
Then it was “Hey, Reginald!” so many times I began to feel I was with
a rock star. “Seems like every other person knows you,” I accused. He
was beaming. That’s the look I carry with me now, the happiness of that moment for him along with the joy of a seven-year long friendship, the conversations and emails, his inspiring life history, and, of course, his work. I’m especially happy that he found a way to reach and touch so many people through his blog, that he was featured in Poets and Writers and American Poetry Review, that his anthologies and essays found their way to print, that he received the Guggenheim this year (after 18 tries!), and that so many now know him and can love him as he deserved.
Books
by Reginald Shepherd: Lyric
Postmodernisms: An Anthology of Contemporary Innovative Poetries
(editor, 2008) Orpheus
in the Bronx: Identity, Politics, and the Freedom of Poetry (essays,
2008) Fata
Morgana (poems, 2007) The
Iowa Anthology of New American Poetries (editor, 2004) Otherhood
(poems, 2003) Wrong
(poems, 1999) Angel,
Interrupted (poems, 1996) Some
Are Drowning (poems, 1994, winner of the 1993 Associated Writing
Programs’ Award in Poetry) Reginald’s Blog: http://reginaldshepherd.blogspot.com/ |
|||
| Home | To report broken links or problems accessing
this website, © 2008 Contemporary Poetry Review |